Microservices – not so long ago this word functioned as a buzzword in the minds of many developers and business people, who wanted to reap the supposed benefits of this architecture, even though they really didn’t fully understand what microservices actually are. Today, there are tons of companies that made microservices part of their everyday reality. But is it really all roses for them? How much of their experience with microservices in 2021 is made of struggle?
If you haven’t started following The Software House blog today, you’re probably aware that we wrote a fair share of articles about microservices.
Having said all that, we felt that we needed an introduction article for CTOs and other decision-makers who still ponder whether microservices are the step in the right direction for them.Below, you will also find a full list of all microservices-related articles we have ever written! Take your time exploring the potential of microservices in 2021!
What are microservices?
Microservices are a popular variant of the service-oriented architecture, in which the application is arranged as a collection of loosely coupled services.
Want a more descriptive explanation? Imagine a huge corporation. It probably has some departments responsible for specific areas such as IT, Human Resources, Finances etc. Each department has its own culture, backlog and processes. When you need to do something related to IT, you call them. When you need to check an invoice, you go to Finances.
Those are microservices. A relatively small application, responsible for a specific domain. That way, each problem can be taken care of by a resource specialized in that one problem only.
For a more technical explanation, read the “Advantages and disadvantages of using microservices” article linked at the end of this post.
Benefits of microservices
Microservices provide developers and businesses with a plethora of benefits:
- Unlike monolithic applications, microservices give us the flexibility needed to scale a single part instead of the whole application. You can tune up the resources required for a specific microservice.
- By splitting the whole app into smaller pieces, it is easier to maintain and develop it. It also has the additional benefit of error boundaries (each error will be limited to only one particular piece of the application ).
- By having more small apps, we also can scale up the team easily. No more huge code conflicts; no more long deployments!
One could say that:
A good microservices architecture will narrow a failure of the whole system down to a feature related to that specific service only.
The rest of the app should work just fine.
- Only microservices give us the option to use the best suited technology for a specific job. We could have a microservice in Go for some low-level computing operations, some microservices in Python for ML-related job, and a Node.js microservice for real-time/api communication. Microservices mean flexibility in the choice of technology.
Interested in the entire software development stack from TSH? Check our Technology Radar and find out what technologies we recommend and like best!
Should your company use microservice architecture?
Most of the time, we hear that microservices are good for large applications. Our experience shows something different. There is no point in having a lot of microservices if you don’t have a specialist able to handle them. It applies to developers as well as DevOps engineers.
Let’s be honest – microservices are hard to set up. They require extensive architectural knowledge, proven infrastructure experience, etc. The decision to join the “microservices club” should be based on the size of your application and also the size of your team.
If your business domain is complex and there are clear boundaries between departments, or if you plan to have some advanced processing in your app that could be delegated somewhere else, then microservices are a good choice for you.
Microservices are meant for companies that need to grow up and be able to scale up the application and the team horizontally.
If you have a relatively small company with a few developers who have no previous microservices experience, I would recommend sticking to a modular monolith – the type of architecture that sits between the good old monolith and microservices.
There is also another option that is much closer to microservices, yet doesn’t require great DevOps involvement in your project – serverless. This framework is probably one of the best options available for a small company that needs to cut down on the initial cost of development while retaining the flexibility for future scaling.
Microservices trends & predictions
One of the coolest things about software architecture is that it doesn’t change so often. Something that might be worth mentioning is the growing importance of data-driven architecture that uses a data lake.
We see this as a trend that will probably become a standard in the future, so it’s an area worth exploring.
The cloud is the undeniable future for microservices. Both AWS and Azure are adding new services. A few months ago, AWS announced the Fault Injection Simulator, which is a specialized service to test your microservices resilience.
Every few months, we see new changes to the serverless approach, which is getting more and more popular. This also marks the beginning of nanoservices – something that was considered an anti-pattern that became a popular solution thanks to a range of serverless functions.
How to find a company that understands microservices?
I would say there are three main challenges to being good at microservice development. These are also the factors that you need to consider when finding the right company to help you with this architecture:
1. You need people capable of designing microservices-based architectures. Such architects should have previous experience with different communication options (APIs, queues, events etc.) and patterns (API Gateways, sagas, backend for frontends).
2. Then, you need developers to build such an architecture. Look for a developer who knows how to work with multiple microservices, test the integrations, build a continuous integration pipeline, but also understands the patterns behind such an approach.
3. Then, finally you would need DevOps Engineers who would focus on monitoring infrastructure as code and making your infrastructure highly available, high-performing, and resilient.
If any of those three ingredients are missing, then your company won’t be able to engage in microservices-based projects.
All microservices articles from The Software House!
And that’s it for the introduction to microservices! Still not sure what to do? Well, one way to go about it is to schedule a free and confidential call with our cloud-certified development team that deals with them day-by-day to define how you can make your project successful.
In addition to that, you can check out all of our microservices-related articles prepared by TSH’s senior developers. They will help you make educated choices regarding microservice-based architecture.
- Key findings on microservices from the State of Microservices report
Did you know that debugging is among the most troublesome aspect of microservice development for many devs? Or that micro frontends are becoming an increasingly big trend in modern development, but still only 24% of programmers have ever used them?
- Advantages and disadvantages of using microservices
What are microservices exactly and how do they work? How are they different from the traditional monolithic-based approach to web development? In this article, we’re going to guide through the basics of using microservices.
- Design patterns in microservices – not just for developers!
Design patterns standardize the use of microservices and make it easier to use them to their fullest potential. However, some of them may be better choices than others in specific scenarios. Our developers are analyzing the most popular design patterns – an essential read not just for developers, but CTOs and other C-level decision makers as well!
- Migrating from a monolith to microservices – part 1
Now that you’re sure about migrating your monolithic application to microservices, you need to prepare yourself. Making the right decisions from the start is going to have a great impact on the scalability and performance of your app.
- Migrating from a monolith to microservices – part 2
Moving to microservices requires a whole lot of different decisions. Some of them include choosing specific software architecture design patterns, solving data flow problems, choosing infrastructure, establishing debugging methods. and monitoring, among many other things.
- Strategies and tools for maximizing microservices benefits
From our State of Microservices 2020 report, we were able to determine that testing is a major challenge for many developers and businesses working with microservices-based systems. In this article, we’re analyzing why and providing practical insights that will make your experience with testing microservices easier.
- Q&A about design patterns for microservices
Design patterns make it easy to make sense of microservices. They provide best practices in architecture that you can use to create efficient and scalable applications. In this Q&A, we’re answering questions about design patterns such as REST API Gateway, or Backend for Frontend.
- Job interview questions for microservices expert candidates
- gRPC microservices pattern for PHP
gRPC is a framework that makes it easier to solve various issues with communication between services in a microservices-based architecture. While typical for Node.js, the gRPC technology can be used for other programming languages such as PHP. Here is a quick and practical gRPC for PHP tutorial!
- gRPC microservices patterns tutorial
- Integration tests for microservices architecture with Docker
As our State of Microservices report proves, testing is a major issue for companies that build microservices-based web applications. You can improve your integration tests for microservice architecture using Docker as explained in this practical guide.
 Just kidding!!!